Main, P (2023, March 28). Cognitive Thinking Skills. Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/cognitive-thinking-skills
What are Cognitive Thinking Skills?
Cognitive thinking skills are the mental processes that allow us to perceive, understand, and analyze information. These skills are essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Fortunately, cognitive thinking skills can be learned and developed with practice and training.
In this article, we'll explore what cognitive thinking skills are, why they are important, and how we can promote them in the classroom. We'll also provide some practical tips and exercises to help you enhance your students' cognitive thinking skills to become more effective problem-solvers and decision-makers.
Using the house of cognition model, this article will look at each part of the house and then go on to suggest how this model can help us to understand failure to learn. The article will outline why it is important to focus on cognitive skills and cognitive processes in order to support learning.
Learning is a complex process that involves various cognitive thinking skills such as attention, memory, problem-solving, and decision-making. These skills are essential for acquiring new knowledge, making connections between different concepts, and applying what has been learned in different situations.
By understanding the different components of cognitive thinking skills and how they relate to learning, we can develop strategies to support learners and help them overcome obstacles to learning. It is important to recognize that cognitive skills are not fixed, but can be developed and improved with practice and targeted interventions.
Using the House of Cognition
The foundations of the house are the underpinning theories about cognition. These theories would need several separate articles to explore them in detail, but the ‘headlines’ of these theories are:
Social and cultural factors are important. Our culture affects the way we perceive things. Cognition and learning develop in a social context. Lev Vygotsky is probably the most well know proponent of these ideas. Social interactions promote cognitive development, particularly where those interactions are with a ‘more knowledgeable other’ (MKO). This MKO type of interaction assists the learner to perform at a higher level;
Cognition and cognitive abilities aren’t fixed. Our thinking, reasoning and problem-solving skills can be affected by many factors. For example, dealing with trauma or the lasting effects of ACEs (adverse childhood experiences). Professor Reuven Feuerstein’s experiences in the 1950s working with young people who were Holocaust survivors led him to suggest that intelligence wasn’t fixed, because the young people he worked with had to put all their energies into coping with their trauma, resulting in a reduction in their capacity for reasoning and problem-solving.
Supporting cognitive thinking skills
How can we support and promote cognitive thinking skills? The idea of the house of cognition is one way of providing a structure for this support. It also helps us to understand some of the factors involved in successful – and unsuccessful – learning.
The bricks that make up the house of cognition are the cognitive thinking skills that all individuals develop and use. Professor Reuven Feuerstein's work, mentioned above, led him to draw up a list of what he called cognitive functions.
These cognitive functions are what we might also call thinking skills, learning-to-learn skills, cognitive processes, cognitive ability or cognitive skills. Feuerstein’s original list was of deficient cognitive functions but later this list was turned round to describe what we should, rather than what we shouldn’t see. He organised his list of cognitive thinking skills into three areas.
Input: the cognitive thinking skills that the learner needs to gather all the information that they need to complete a task or solve a problem.
Elaboration: the cognitive thinking skills that the learner needs to complete a task or solve a problem
Output: the cognitive thinking skills that the learner needs to show what they have learned
One important part of Feuerstein’s work was that he recognised the importance of the affective elements of learning. What do we mean by the affective element? Basically, this involves emotions, feelings and attitudes. It relates to how we deal with things emotionally. Feuerstein called these non intellective factors.
The cognitive thinking skills and non-intellective factors are shown in the table below. Information in this table is drawn from Adey and Shayer, Feuerstein and Lidz.
Organising cognitive thinking skills
INPUT
Focussed perception, paying attention
Using all the senses to gather information
Systematic search/exploration, planning
Gathering information using a system or plan so that nothing is missed
Conservation
Knowing what stays the same and what changes.
Using labels
Giving the things we gather through our senses and our experience names so that we can remember them more clearly and talk about them
Use of temporal and spatial concepts
Using knowledge about space and time: describing things and events in terms of where and when they occur
Precision and accuracy
Being precise and accurate when it matters; recognising the need to be precise and accurate when gathering information
Considering more than one source of information
Gathering information from several sources; organising the information we gather by considering more than one thing at a time (working memory is used to hold information in our head whilst gathering other information)
ELABORATION
Defining the problem
Knowing what to do with the information gathered: what do we need to do or figure out
Relevance
Using only the part of the information we have gathered that is relevant, that is, that applies to the problem, and ignoring the rest
Planning and sequencing
Making a plan that will include the steps we need to take to reach our goal, knowing what to do first, second, and so on, knowing what ‘finished’ looks like.
Comparison
Being able to recognise what is the same and what is different
Categorising
Finding the class or set that new objects or experiences belong to
Projecting relationships
Seeing how things go together; looking for the relationship by which separate objects, events, and experiences can be used together
Hypothetical thinking
If………..then thinking; thinking about different possibilities and figuring out what would happen if you were to choose one or another
Working with several sources of information: memory
Working memory: holding information in your head whilst working with it.
Short term memory: recalling recent learning.
Long termmemory: recalling previous learning or approaches to solving problems
Logical justification
Being able to defend your opinion or choice using logical evidence
Interiorisation
Having a good picture in our mind of what we are looking for, or what we must do
OUTPUT
Precision and accuracy in communication
Communicating clearly using precise and accurate language so your answer is clear
Communicating outcomes
Having the necessary vocabulary/expressive skills to communicate findings
Reducing egocentric communication
Being able to put yourself in the shoes of the listener
Restraining impulsivity
Thinking before responding; reducing a trial and error approach to learning; count to 10 (at least) so that you do not say or do something you will be sorry for later
Overcoming blocking
Not being able to respond because the learner feels that s/he can’t do it. If you cannot answer a question for some reason even though you ‘know’ the answer, do not fret or panic. Leave the question for a little while and then, when you return to it, use a strategy to help you find the answer
Visual transport
Mentally lifting something up and placing it elsewhere; Carrying an exact picture of an object in your mind to another place for comparison without losing or changing some details
NON INTELLECTIVE FACTORS
Motivation
Wanting to learn and take part, engagement in the task/activity/lesson. How interested is the learner?
Curiosity
Willingness to find out
Frustration tolerance
Coping when tasks are challenging: what does the learner do when things become tough?
Wanting to tackle a more difficult task or step of a task
Response to mediation/intervention of adults
How the learner responds to the adult’s mediation, intervention or support
Persistence
Keeping going, seeing a task through to the end
Flexibility
The learner tries out alternative solutions or self corrects, or the learner perseveres in using a strategy even when it does not work
Promoting Thinking Skills
The mortar that holds together the bricks of the house of cognition represents the process of mediation. Mediation is a specific way of supporting and promoting cognitive thinking skills. We saw that there are five layers to the cognitive map which help us to understand task demands.
Using the house of cognition analogy, if we simply pile up bricks the house won’t be stable. We have to stick the bricks together. So, if we teach cognitive thinking skills without sticking them together, they are not likely to be useful.
Mediation is a way of helping pupils to make links between the curriculum they are following and the cognitive thinking skills they are using. Feuerstein suggested that for an interaction to be called mediation, the following three essential characteristics have to be present:
Intentionality and reciprocity: all this means is that mediation is an intentional act. It doesn’t happen by accident. Reciprocity means that you will adjust your mediation according to how the pupil responds.
Meaning: this is where you communicate the importance of the task or activity. With most pupils we can tell them that ‘this is important because’….’we are doing this because….’. Where pupils are very young and still acquiring language, or have some language delay, we might communicate meaning by showing enthusiasm through your body language or tone of voice
Transcendence: this is also called bridging, because it is about building bridges between the current task, previous learning and future learning.
These essential characteristics are important because interaction can only be called mediation when these three characteristics are used. Kathy Greenberg gives a useful overview of how mediation is more than good teaching. Greenberg suggests what 'Teacher-Mediators' do in contrast to good teachers. Here are some examples:
Teacher-mediators collaborate as another learner with students
Teacher-mediators connect concepts to students' real world experiences
Teacher-mediators provide opportunities for students to explore ideas
Teacher-mediators provide extra time and assistance so every student can reflect on the process of reaching the right answer
The idea of building a house also illustrates the importance of cognitive thinking skills in relation to the taught curriculum. The roof of a house is the last part to be added to the building. It isn't possible to build the roof and then add the other parts of the building.
In our house of cognition, the roof represents the curriculum or the products of learning. Successful learning is being able to put the roof on the house.....and that won’t work without the foundations, bricks and mortar being in place first. Cognitive skills are important foundations for learning.
We could argue that the current National Curriculum and EYFS Early Learning Goals are the roof of the house. They set out the content of what should be learned; the products of learning. Therefore, schools and early years settings mostly work on the roof of the house. There is little or no emphasis on the other parts of the house of cognition, so there is nothing to hold up the roof.
Promoting Cognition Skills in Special Education
Promoting cognitive skills in children with special educational needs can be a challenging but rewarding task. Here are nine practical strategies that teachers can use:
Scaffold Learning: Break down complex tasks into smaller, manageable parts. This helps students understand each component before moving on to the next. This approach is particularly useful for children with dyslexia who may struggle with information overload.
Use Visual Aids: Visual aids can help children with dyspraxia and other cognitive impairments understand abstract concepts. Diagrams, charts, and other visual tools can make learning more engaging and accessible.
Promote Active Learning: Encourage students to participate actively in their learning process. This could involve hands-on activities, group work, or problem-solving tasks. Active learning promotes critical thinking and reasoning skills.
Teach Metacognitive Strategies: Metacognition, or thinking about thinking, can help students understand their own learning processes. Teaching strategies like self-questioning and reflection can improve students' ability to monitor their own understanding and adjust their learning strategies as needed.
Incorporate Technology: Assistive technology can be a powerful tool for supporting students with special educational needs. For example, speech-to-text software can help students with dyslexia improve their writing skills.
Differentiate Instruction: Tailor your teaching methods to meet the individual needs of each student. Differentiated instruction can involve adjusting the content, process, product, or learning environment to support each student's learning style and ability level.
Encourage Cooperative Learning: Group activities can promote social skills and cooperative learning. Working in a team can help students develop their communication and interpersonal skills, which are crucial for their cognitive development.
Use Real-World Examples: Applying learning to real-world situations can make abstract concepts more concrete. This can help students understand the relevance of what they're learning and improve their long-term memory.
Provide Regular Feedback: Regular, constructive feedback can help students understand their strengths and areas for improvement. This can motivate them to work on their weaknesses and enhance their cognitive skills.
Remember, every child is unique, and what works for one might not work for another. It's important to be patient, flexible, and creative in your approach.
Key Insights:
Breaking down complex tasks into smaller parts can make learning more manageable for students with cognitive impairments.
Visual aids, active learning, and real-world examples can make abstract concepts more concrete and understandable.
Regular, constructive feedback can motivate students to improve their cognitive skills.
According to a study by the American Society for Engineering Education, using real-world examples in teaching can significantly improve students' understanding and retention of information. As the famous educational psychologist Jean Piaget once said, "The goal of education is not to increase the amount of knowledge but to create the possibilities for a child to invent and discover, to create men who are capable of doing new things."
Focusing on the process of learning
So how do we put the roof on the house? This can be a challenge when there is so much emphasis on delivering the products, rather than the processes of learning. However, a few simple adjustments can be made in order to include the bricks and mortar in everyday classroom practice:
In curriculum planning, think about the cognitive functions or cognitive skills that are needed for particular tasks
During teacher-led sessions that involve explaining and/or demonstrating tasks, make explicit reference to the cognitive functions that learners will use. Here’s an example that you might use for a written expression task:
‘when you do this piece of writing you will make a plan. A plan means thinking about something before you do it and deciding the steps you need to do to finish the task. You decide what to do first and next and so on. So when we use a plan for writing we have three big chunks, the beginning, the middle and the end. Then for each chunk we will list in order what will happen in our story. When we have this plan we can begin to write in more detail’
When pupils are completing the task, use open-ended questions or prompts that focus on the learning process or cognitive skill (that is, the thinking skills). For example:
‘what does finished look like?’
‘What will you do first? And next?’
‘Let’s make a plan so you don’t miss anything out’
‘What can you do to help you to remember?’
Focusing on the processes of learning through supporting cognitive thinking skills will help children and young people to be successful and independent learners. If an individual knows how to learn they will develop skills and behaviours that are transferable to all kinds of contexts beyond the classroom and the taught curriculum.
References
Adey, P. and Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge
Greenberg, K.H. (2005). The Cognitive Enrichment Advantage Handbook. Knoxville, USA: KCD Harris and Associate Press
Feuerstein, R (nd). Developed Cognitive Functions. Source: Feuerstein Institute, www.icelp.info
Lidz, C. (2007). Application of Cognitive Functions Behaviour Rating Scale. In: Haywood and Lidz, 2007, Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press
Cognitive thinking skills are the mental processes that allow us to perceive, understand, and analyze information. These skills are essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Fortunately, cognitive thinking skills can be learned and developed with practice and training.
In this article, we'll explore what cognitive thinking skills are, why they are important, and how we can promote them in the classroom. We'll also provide some practical tips and exercises to help you enhance your students' cognitive thinking skills to become more effective problem-solvers and decision-makers.
Using the house of cognition model, this article will look at each part of the house and then go on to suggest how this model can help us to understand failure to learn. The article will outline why it is important to focus on cognitive skills and cognitive processes in order to support learning.
Learning is a complex process that involves various cognitive thinking skills such as attention, memory, problem-solving, and decision-making. These skills are essential for acquiring new knowledge, making connections between different concepts, and applying what has been learned in different situations.
By understanding the different components of cognitive thinking skills and how they relate to learning, we can develop strategies to support learners and help them overcome obstacles to learning. It is important to recognize that cognitive skills are not fixed, but can be developed and improved with practice and targeted interventions.
Using the House of Cognition
The foundations of the house are the underpinning theories about cognition. These theories would need several separate articles to explore them in detail, but the ‘headlines’ of these theories are:
Social and cultural factors are important. Our culture affects the way we perceive things. Cognition and learning develop in a social context. Lev Vygotsky is probably the most well know proponent of these ideas. Social interactions promote cognitive development, particularly where those interactions are with a ‘more knowledgeable other’ (MKO). This MKO type of interaction assists the learner to perform at a higher level;
Cognition and cognitive abilities aren’t fixed. Our thinking, reasoning and problem-solving skills can be affected by many factors. For example, dealing with trauma or the lasting effects of ACEs (adverse childhood experiences). Professor Reuven Feuerstein’s experiences in the 1950s working with young people who were Holocaust survivors led him to suggest that intelligence wasn’t fixed, because the young people he worked with had to put all their energies into coping with their trauma, resulting in a reduction in their capacity for reasoning and problem-solving.
Supporting cognitive thinking skills
How can we support and promote cognitive thinking skills? The idea of the house of cognition is one way of providing a structure for this support. It also helps us to understand some of the factors involved in successful – and unsuccessful – learning.
The bricks that make up the house of cognition are the cognitive thinking skills that all individuals develop and use. Professor Reuven Feuerstein's work, mentioned above, led him to draw up a list of what he called cognitive functions.
These cognitive functions are what we might also call thinking skills, learning-to-learn skills, cognitive processes, cognitive ability or cognitive skills. Feuerstein’s original list was of deficient cognitive functions but later this list was turned round to describe what we should, rather than what we shouldn’t see. He organised his list of cognitive thinking skills into three areas.
Input: the cognitive thinking skills that the learner needs to gather all the information that they need to complete a task or solve a problem.
Elaboration: the cognitive thinking skills that the learner needs to complete a task or solve a problem
Output: the cognitive thinking skills that the learner needs to show what they have learned
One important part of Feuerstein’s work was that he recognised the importance of the affective elements of learning. What do we mean by the affective element? Basically, this involves emotions, feelings and attitudes. It relates to how we deal with things emotionally. Feuerstein called these non intellective factors.
The cognitive thinking skills and non-intellective factors are shown in the table below. Information in this table is drawn from Adey and Shayer, Feuerstein and Lidz.
Organising cognitive thinking skills
INPUT
Focussed perception, paying attention
Using all the senses to gather information
Systematic search/exploration, planning
Gathering information using a system or plan so that nothing is missed
Conservation
Knowing what stays the same and what changes.
Using labels
Giving the things we gather through our senses and our experience names so that we can remember them more clearly and talk about them
Use of temporal and spatial concepts
Using knowledge about space and time: describing things and events in terms of where and when they occur
Precision and accuracy
Being precise and accurate when it matters; recognising the need to be precise and accurate when gathering information
Considering more than one source of information
Gathering information from several sources; organising the information we gather by considering more than one thing at a time (working memory is used to hold information in our head whilst gathering other information)
ELABORATION
Defining the problem
Knowing what to do with the information gathered: what do we need to do or figure out
Relevance
Using only the part of the information we have gathered that is relevant, that is, that applies to the problem, and ignoring the rest
Planning and sequencing
Making a plan that will include the steps we need to take to reach our goal, knowing what to do first, second, and so on, knowing what ‘finished’ looks like.
Comparison
Being able to recognise what is the same and what is different
Categorising
Finding the class or set that new objects or experiences belong to
Projecting relationships
Seeing how things go together; looking for the relationship by which separate objects, events, and experiences can be used together
Hypothetical thinking
If………..then thinking; thinking about different possibilities and figuring out what would happen if you were to choose one or another
Working with several sources of information: memory
Working memory: holding information in your head whilst working with it.
Short term memory: recalling recent learning.
Long termmemory: recalling previous learning or approaches to solving problems
Logical justification
Being able to defend your opinion or choice using logical evidence
Interiorisation
Having a good picture in our mind of what we are looking for, or what we must do
OUTPUT
Precision and accuracy in communication
Communicating clearly using precise and accurate language so your answer is clear
Communicating outcomes
Having the necessary vocabulary/expressive skills to communicate findings
Reducing egocentric communication
Being able to put yourself in the shoes of the listener
Restraining impulsivity
Thinking before responding; reducing a trial and error approach to learning; count to 10 (at least) so that you do not say or do something you will be sorry for later
Overcoming blocking
Not being able to respond because the learner feels that s/he can’t do it. If you cannot answer a question for some reason even though you ‘know’ the answer, do not fret or panic. Leave the question for a little while and then, when you return to it, use a strategy to help you find the answer
Visual transport
Mentally lifting something up and placing it elsewhere; Carrying an exact picture of an object in your mind to another place for comparison without losing or changing some details
NON INTELLECTIVE FACTORS
Motivation
Wanting to learn and take part, engagement in the task/activity/lesson. How interested is the learner?
Curiosity
Willingness to find out
Frustration tolerance
Coping when tasks are challenging: what does the learner do when things become tough?
Wanting to tackle a more difficult task or step of a task
Response to mediation/intervention of adults
How the learner responds to the adult’s mediation, intervention or support
Persistence
Keeping going, seeing a task through to the end
Flexibility
The learner tries out alternative solutions or self corrects, or the learner perseveres in using a strategy even when it does not work
Promoting Thinking Skills
The mortar that holds together the bricks of the house of cognition represents the process of mediation. Mediation is a specific way of supporting and promoting cognitive thinking skills. We saw that there are five layers to the cognitive map which help us to understand task demands.
Using the house of cognition analogy, if we simply pile up bricks the house won’t be stable. We have to stick the bricks together. So, if we teach cognitive thinking skills without sticking them together, they are not likely to be useful.
Mediation is a way of helping pupils to make links between the curriculum they are following and the cognitive thinking skills they are using. Feuerstein suggested that for an interaction to be called mediation, the following three essential characteristics have to be present:
Intentionality and reciprocity: all this means is that mediation is an intentional act. It doesn’t happen by accident. Reciprocity means that you will adjust your mediation according to how the pupil responds.
Meaning: this is where you communicate the importance of the task or activity. With most pupils we can tell them that ‘this is important because’….’we are doing this because….’. Where pupils are very young and still acquiring language, or have some language delay, we might communicate meaning by showing enthusiasm through your body language or tone of voice
Transcendence: this is also called bridging, because it is about building bridges between the current task, previous learning and future learning.
These essential characteristics are important because interaction can only be called mediation when these three characteristics are used. Kathy Greenberg gives a useful overview of how mediation is more than good teaching. Greenberg suggests what 'Teacher-Mediators' do in contrast to good teachers. Here are some examples:
Teacher-mediators collaborate as another learner with students
Teacher-mediators connect concepts to students' real world experiences
Teacher-mediators provide opportunities for students to explore ideas
Teacher-mediators provide extra time and assistance so every student can reflect on the process of reaching the right answer
The idea of building a house also illustrates the importance of cognitive thinking skills in relation to the taught curriculum. The roof of a house is the last part to be added to the building. It isn't possible to build the roof and then add the other parts of the building.
In our house of cognition, the roof represents the curriculum or the products of learning. Successful learning is being able to put the roof on the house.....and that won’t work without the foundations, bricks and mortar being in place first. Cognitive skills are important foundations for learning.
We could argue that the current National Curriculum and EYFS Early Learning Goals are the roof of the house. They set out the content of what should be learned; the products of learning. Therefore, schools and early years settings mostly work on the roof of the house. There is little or no emphasis on the other parts of the house of cognition, so there is nothing to hold up the roof.
Promoting Cognition Skills in Special Education
Promoting cognitive skills in children with special educational needs can be a challenging but rewarding task. Here are nine practical strategies that teachers can use:
Scaffold Learning: Break down complex tasks into smaller, manageable parts. This helps students understand each component before moving on to the next. This approach is particularly useful for children with dyslexia who may struggle with information overload.
Use Visual Aids: Visual aids can help children with dyspraxia and other cognitive impairments understand abstract concepts. Diagrams, charts, and other visual tools can make learning more engaging and accessible.
Promote Active Learning: Encourage students to participate actively in their learning process. This could involve hands-on activities, group work, or problem-solving tasks. Active learning promotes critical thinking and reasoning skills.
Teach Metacognitive Strategies: Metacognition, or thinking about thinking, can help students understand their own learning processes. Teaching strategies like self-questioning and reflection can improve students' ability to monitor their own understanding and adjust their learning strategies as needed.
Incorporate Technology: Assistive technology can be a powerful tool for supporting students with special educational needs. For example, speech-to-text software can help students with dyslexia improve their writing skills.
Differentiate Instruction: Tailor your teaching methods to meet the individual needs of each student. Differentiated instruction can involve adjusting the content, process, product, or learning environment to support each student's learning style and ability level.
Encourage Cooperative Learning: Group activities can promote social skills and cooperative learning. Working in a team can help students develop their communication and interpersonal skills, which are crucial for their cognitive development.
Use Real-World Examples: Applying learning to real-world situations can make abstract concepts more concrete. This can help students understand the relevance of what they're learning and improve their long-term memory.
Provide Regular Feedback: Regular, constructive feedback can help students understand their strengths and areas for improvement. This can motivate them to work on their weaknesses and enhance their cognitive skills.
Remember, every child is unique, and what works for one might not work for another. It's important to be patient, flexible, and creative in your approach.
Key Insights:
Breaking down complex tasks into smaller parts can make learning more manageable for students with cognitive impairments.
Visual aids, active learning, and real-world examples can make abstract concepts more concrete and understandable.
Regular, constructive feedback can motivate students to improve their cognitive skills.
According to a study by the American Society for Engineering Education, using real-world examples in teaching can significantly improve students' understanding and retention of information. As the famous educational psychologist Jean Piaget once said, "The goal of education is not to increase the amount of knowledge but to create the possibilities for a child to invent and discover, to create men who are capable of doing new things."
Focusing on the process of learning
So how do we put the roof on the house? This can be a challenge when there is so much emphasis on delivering the products, rather than the processes of learning. However, a few simple adjustments can be made in order to include the bricks and mortar in everyday classroom practice:
In curriculum planning, think about the cognitive functions or cognitive skills that are needed for particular tasks
During teacher-led sessions that involve explaining and/or demonstrating tasks, make explicit reference to the cognitive functions that learners will use. Here’s an example that you might use for a written expression task:
‘when you do this piece of writing you will make a plan. A plan means thinking about something before you do it and deciding the steps you need to do to finish the task. You decide what to do first and next and so on. So when we use a plan for writing we have three big chunks, the beginning, the middle and the end. Then for each chunk we will list in order what will happen in our story. When we have this plan we can begin to write in more detail’
When pupils are completing the task, use open-ended questions or prompts that focus on the learning process or cognitive skill (that is, the thinking skills). For example:
‘what does finished look like?’
‘What will you do first? And next?’
‘Let’s make a plan so you don’t miss anything out’
‘What can you do to help you to remember?’
Focusing on the processes of learning through supporting cognitive thinking skills will help children and young people to be successful and independent learners. If an individual knows how to learn they will develop skills and behaviours that are transferable to all kinds of contexts beyond the classroom and the taught curriculum.
References
Adey, P. and Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: Cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge
Greenberg, K.H. (2005). The Cognitive Enrichment Advantage Handbook. Knoxville, USA: KCD Harris and Associate Press
Feuerstein, R (nd). Developed Cognitive Functions. Source: Feuerstein Institute, www.icelp.info
Lidz, C. (2007). Application of Cognitive Functions Behaviour Rating Scale. In: Haywood and Lidz, 2007, Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press