Benjamin, Z (2021, October 12). Improving students memory. Retrieved from https://www.structural-learning.com/post/improving-students-memory-a-guide-to-the-research
How to improve students memory
Zoe Benjamin from Heathfield School breaks down the key studies about student memory. Think about the implications for lesson planning and delivery, if this area is of interest be sure to look through our growing research repository. In this brief article, we look at some of the fundamental studies that have helped shed light on how knowledge of memory has helped inform instructional practice. Some of these key studies have helped us rethink how we design and deliver lessons. These broad principles should enable educators to embrace an evidence informed learning environment. Each of the areas have been explained in further articles that you might be interested in reading. Along with these blogs, we have a selection of infographics to visualise the 'big picture'.
Memory
Dunlosky et al (2013)
Retrieval practice and distributed practice (spacing) are very effective at improving long-term memory. Elaborative interrogation (asking ‘why?’ to help make connections) and interleaved practice (mixing up topics to revise rather than revising whole topics at a time) are fairly effective strategies. Highlighting, underlining and re-reading were not found to help improve long-term memory.
Spacing revision is more effective than cramming, especially if you need to remember the material for a long time. The gaps between revision should increase as students get closer to the exam. The researchers proposed the following spacing schedule for retaining new information from the day it is first encountered: 3 days, 8 days, 12 days, 27 days.
Spacing out revision over a week rather than doing it in one sitting produced significantly higher test results. One week after the test, students who mixed different topics together (interleaving) during revision answered over three times more questions correctly than students who revised the material as one block at a time.
Revising in silence produced the highest number of correct answers on a test. Revising while listening to music without lyrics produced the second highest number of correct answers. Students who listened to music with lyrics answered a third less of the questions correctly compared to the silent revision group. There was no difference between the test scores of students listening to music with lyrics that they liked and lyrics that they disliked.
Students who had one study period followed by one session of retrieval practice scored at least 30% higher when tested than students who had two study periods of reading. Retrieval practice becomes more powerful when material needs to be remembered for longer periods of time and studying by reading becomes less effective. Students rated re-reading as a more effective method of revision but subsequently scored 50% more when using retrieval practice for revision. Students reported finding retrieval practice a more interesting form of revision.
Students remembered twice as many facts presented as sentences when they were asked a ‘why’ question relating to each sentence compared to hearing the sentences alone or hearing the sentences with an explanation.
The researchers compared the effectiveness of learning key terms when reading them in silence, reading them out loud, listening to a recording of yourself reading them and listening to someone else read them to you. The greatest difference in performance was between reading the words out loud and reading the words in silence. Reading out loud led to a 12% increase in performance.
When students studied using pictures and words they were better able to apply their knowledge to different problems, situations and questions than when they studied using words alone. Verbal recall of facts was not affected by the presence of pictures. Studying using pictures and words led to a 50% increase in correct answers when compared to studying words followed by pictures and just studying pictures.
Students performed better on a test when they were told they would be asked to teach the material to someone else compared to those who were told to prepare for a test. Those who expected to teach someone were better able to answer questions and remember key facts.
Ebbinghaus (1880) created a forgetting curve based on studies, which showed how much new information is forgotten during the first 31 days after learning. Murre and Dros (2015) replicated these findings, showing that approximately 42% of learnt material is forgotten after just 20 minutes. However, they found that memory is better in the morning following learning than it is in the evening of the day the material was learnt (showing a boost in memory overnight). They found support for the primacy and recency effects (the first and last thing learnt are remembered more than those in the middle).
Students performed better on a test when they had been asked questions about a topic immediately before being taught it (pre-questioning). Their performance on test questions was improved when the topic matched the pre-question topic and when the topic did not match the pre-question topic compared to the performance of a group of students who were not given any pre-questions.
Researchers compared the effectiveness of re-reading and retrieval practice when revising for tests completed in stressful and non-stressful environments. Students using retrieval practice outperformed students using re-reading in all conditions, including retrieval practice in a stressful environment compared to re-reading in a non-stressful environment. Students who used re-reading for revision suffered the most during stressful situations whereas students using retrieval practice were not negatively affected by stress.
Zoe Benjamin from Heathfield School breaks down the key studies about student memory. Think about the implications for lesson planning and delivery, if this area is of interest be sure to look through our growing research repository. In this brief article, we look at some of the fundamental studies that have helped shed light on how knowledge of memory has helped inform instructional practice. Some of these key studies have helped us rethink how we design and deliver lessons. These broad principles should enable educators to embrace an evidence informed learning environment. Each of the areas have been explained in further articles that you might be interested in reading. Along with these blogs, we have a selection of infographics to visualise the 'big picture'.
Memory
Dunlosky et al (2013)
Retrieval practice and distributed practice (spacing) are very effective at improving long-term memory. Elaborative interrogation (asking ‘why?’ to help make connections) and interleaved practice (mixing up topics to revise rather than revising whole topics at a time) are fairly effective strategies. Highlighting, underlining and re-reading were not found to help improve long-term memory.
Spacing revision is more effective than cramming, especially if you need to remember the material for a long time. The gaps between revision should increase as students get closer to the exam. The researchers proposed the following spacing schedule for retaining new information from the day it is first encountered: 3 days, 8 days, 12 days, 27 days.
Spacing out revision over a week rather than doing it in one sitting produced significantly higher test results. One week after the test, students who mixed different topics together (interleaving) during revision answered over three times more questions correctly than students who revised the material as one block at a time.
Revising in silence produced the highest number of correct answers on a test. Revising while listening to music without lyrics produced the second highest number of correct answers. Students who listened to music with lyrics answered a third less of the questions correctly compared to the silent revision group. There was no difference between the test scores of students listening to music with lyrics that they liked and lyrics that they disliked.
Students who had one study period followed by one session of retrieval practice scored at least 30% higher when tested than students who had two study periods of reading. Retrieval practice becomes more powerful when material needs to be remembered for longer periods of time and studying by reading becomes less effective. Students rated re-reading as a more effective method of revision but subsequently scored 50% more when using retrieval practice for revision. Students reported finding retrieval practice a more interesting form of revision.
Students remembered twice as many facts presented as sentences when they were asked a ‘why’ question relating to each sentence compared to hearing the sentences alone or hearing the sentences with an explanation.
The researchers compared the effectiveness of learning key terms when reading them in silence, reading them out loud, listening to a recording of yourself reading them and listening to someone else read them to you. The greatest difference in performance was between reading the words out loud and reading the words in silence. Reading out loud led to a 12% increase in performance.
When students studied using pictures and words they were better able to apply their knowledge to different problems, situations and questions than when they studied using words alone. Verbal recall of facts was not affected by the presence of pictures. Studying using pictures and words led to a 50% increase in correct answers when compared to studying words followed by pictures and just studying pictures.
Students performed better on a test when they were told they would be asked to teach the material to someone else compared to those who were told to prepare for a test. Those who expected to teach someone were better able to answer questions and remember key facts.
Ebbinghaus (1880) created a forgetting curve based on studies, which showed how much new information is forgotten during the first 31 days after learning. Murre and Dros (2015) replicated these findings, showing that approximately 42% of learnt material is forgotten after just 20 minutes. However, they found that memory is better in the morning following learning than it is in the evening of the day the material was learnt (showing a boost in memory overnight). They found support for the primacy and recency effects (the first and last thing learnt are remembered more than those in the middle).
Students performed better on a test when they had been asked questions about a topic immediately before being taught it (pre-questioning). Their performance on test questions was improved when the topic matched the pre-question topic and when the topic did not match the pre-question topic compared to the performance of a group of students who were not given any pre-questions.
Researchers compared the effectiveness of re-reading and retrieval practice when revising for tests completed in stressful and non-stressful environments. Students using retrieval practice outperformed students using re-reading in all conditions, including retrieval practice in a stressful environment compared to re-reading in a non-stressful environment. Students who used re-reading for revision suffered the most during stressful situations whereas students using retrieval practice were not negatively affected by stress.